Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 22:44
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 390
51% 384 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 65.6
56% 67.3 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 66.7
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 720GB 720GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T190723
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 85 88 85 42 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 430
Write 426
Mixed 350
SusWrite 112
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 35.2
125% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 217
170% 232 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
540GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 119 121 122 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 183
Write 134
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 121
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87%
Great: 113%
VendorCo ProductCode 268GB
221GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.6 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 2,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback