TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory9.2 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440x900x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '19 at 18:16
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 140
62% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 435
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 73%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 843B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 28.5
19% 25 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 24.6
19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 19.1%
 Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 92 94 88 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 87.7
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.4
241% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 58.8%
 Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
466GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 179 178 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 181
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 180
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 21.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 53.2%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples275x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples255x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples146x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples124x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples99x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples53x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples36x
RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback