Asrock Z170M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z170M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180123
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 06:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 697
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 71.2
60% 73.3 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 71.8
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKHW120A4 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 122 129 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 415
Write 144
Mixed 189
SusWrite 120
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 40.7
159% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 104
95% 147 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 176 179 180 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 168
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 171
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 108%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
318GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 88 87 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 51
Write 48.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 86.9
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback