Asrock J4105M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock J4105M  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 17:17
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.5% Below average
Memory 46.5
1-Core 52
2-Core 103
39% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 201
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6346
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 1.97
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 2.28
2% 2.54 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 4.48
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 347
Mixed 285
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 13
50% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 5.4
DQ Mixed 39.7
33% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $30
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback