Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '19 at 17:24
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 720
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 50
41% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 92.5
8-Core 101
13% 96.6 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
Asus(1043 8267) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 8.03
Reflection 7.92
Parallax 2.72
6% 6.23 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 6.23
Splatting 5.35
4% 5.42 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 45 45 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 122
Write 101
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 43.2
20% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 22.3
82% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 78.1
DQ Mixed 23.2
26% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35%
Great: 61%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
71GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 46 46 45 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 45
Write 42.2
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 45.9
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 25E9 2TB
2TB free, PID 25e9
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 26.2
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 27.5
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback