DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	9.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '19 at 22:30
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 128 61% 96 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 324 36% 285 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)	54.7% Above average	Lighting 66.4 Reflection 68 Parallax 59.8 54% 64.7 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 67.7 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T2535T120G 120GB 1,793 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0412A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 46 40 46 44 47 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.1% Average	Read 250 Write 228 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 56 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 39.8 4K Mixed 23.1 78% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 19.7 DQ Mixed 42.9 40% 66 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 86%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 17GB free Firmware: HP22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 65 58 60 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 63.1 Write 30.4 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 61.8 37% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 58%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 194GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 27 Write 23.5 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 27.1 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 39%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 96GB free Firmware: MS1OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 112 112 109 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 127 Write 110 Mixed 29 SusWrite 111 68% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 103%
WDC WD50 00LPVX-22V0TT0 500GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 241GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 26 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 27.8 34% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% null MHz 4096, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 10.5 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	314x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	19x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	20x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
MKNSSDS2120GB 120GBMushkinBench 65%, 202 samples	15x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	42x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16