Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 17:16
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 196
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 497
53% 421 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 8711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 171
Parallax 174
136% 170 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 156
Splatting 113
123% 156 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron SS 250GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 166 169 166 165 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 299
Write 316
Mixed 272
SusWrite 167
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 25.2
85% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 106
105% 169 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 103%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
187GB free
Firmware: DXM03B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 179 185 185 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65% Good
Read 352
Write 306
Mixed 255
SusWrite 182
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 29
98% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 115
111% 177 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 30.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback