ADD TO PC
BUILD

Semp STI CS 5093

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Semp STI CS 5093 (all builds)
Motherboard	Semp STI 910133
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121004
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '19 at 02:32
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6300 23 User benchmarks, average bench 35% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	39.4% Below average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 41.8 34% 44.9 Pts	4-Core 42.4 8-Core 42.3 6% 42.3 Pts	64-Core 42.3 3% 42.3 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 470 617 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Sapphire(174B A019) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.3 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.7% Below average	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 57.8 Parallax 61.4 26% 50.6 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 50.7 42% 51.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 78GB free Firmware: UE50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 39 79 82 70 69 MB/s Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 237 Write 181 Mixed 183 SusWrite 87.3 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 17.3 68% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 68.8 DQ Mixed 41.4 44% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 53%
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$46 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 66 68 70 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 71.9 Write 63.5 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 68.4 47% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 49%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 1 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	0.39% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.65 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.39% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical STI CS 5093 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Semp STI CS 5093

CPU
Core2 6300IntelBench 35%, 23 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback