Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FA
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '19 at 16:52
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	10%
CPU Throttled	91%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8145U 15,431 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 212 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 318 42% 317 Pts	64-Core 311 19% 311 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1961) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 9.31 Parallax 6.31 0% 5.22 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 13.2 7% 8.01 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1102 128GB 2,914 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 108 109 109 110 111 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 385 Write 380 Mixed 282 SusWrite 113 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 24.5 97% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 208 176% 258 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 724GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 138 139 136 134 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 127 Write 106 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 137 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GB 1,799 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.8 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_X509FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	109x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	94x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	37x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	240x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	4x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	35x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	32x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	15x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	44x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	37x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16