Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6 (all builds)
Memory	60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '19 at 18:00
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 61 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 185 62% 113 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 739 65% 554 Pts	64-Core 1,533 95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 41.3 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 37.4 34% 36.5 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 35.5 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 111GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 301 299 315 307 291 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 2,230 Write 1,018 Mixed 1,428 SusWrite 352 278% 1,257 MB/s	4K Read 116 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 86.6 324% 91.3 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 146 114% 159 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 280%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 190GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1479 1479 1479 1484 1484 505 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	244% Outstanding	Read 1,512 Write 1,478 Mixed 1,102 SusWrite 1,318 304% 1,353 MB/s	4K Read 54.1 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 70.2 237% 82.2 MB/s	DQ Read 685 DQ Write 650 DQ Mixed 273 313% 536 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 244% Great: 295%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1930 1943 1939 1333 1336 1550 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	293% Outstanding	Read 2,493 Write 1,930 Mixed 1076 SusWrite 1,672 400% 1,793 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 63.1 211% 73.9 MB/s	DQ Read 609 DQ Write 538 DQ Mixed 575 430% 574 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 293% Great: 353%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124 3,845 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2TB free Firmware: CC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 154 159 160 160 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 95.5 Write 110 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 155 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.1 153% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 131 135 135 133 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 66 Write 108 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 131 68% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 186% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 122 139 142 146 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 61.5 Write 124 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 136 72% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 90%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 11GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 22 23 23 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	30% Poor	Read 131 Write 24.9 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 22.5 54% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 3 176% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 8x8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	131% Outstanding	MC Read 52 MC Write 55 MC Mixed 50.4 150% 52.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 22.1 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 156%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	101x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	33x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	33x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	20x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	12x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	10x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	11x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	6x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 84%, 15,358 samples	5x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 91%, 4,119 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $1,145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16