bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory78.1GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 78.1GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory3.6 GB free of 78.125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 08:58
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5122
None, 3 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 117
2-Core 231
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 456
60% 453 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 43GB
28GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 197 199 188 193 195 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 94%
Virtual HD 107GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 200 202 189 197 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 100%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 462GB
155GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 197 199 188 195 195 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 215GB
39GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 199 199 188 195 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 104%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 32GB
17GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,727
Write 350
Mixed 589
896% 1222 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 9.7
3,054% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78GB
null MHz
3968, 32767, 32767, 10498 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 28
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 22.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.2
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback