Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 38 User benchmarks, average bench 56% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 159 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 165 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 59GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.9 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	4.96% Terrible	Read 7.5 Write 8.2 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 7.7 6% 7.93 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.7 393% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.96% Great: 68%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 215GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 39GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.67% Terrible	Read 13 Write 5.2 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 15.4 9% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.1 332% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.67% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 3968, 128 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 15.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 11.4 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325