Positivo POS-PIH55BO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-PIH55BO  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIH55BO
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100615
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '16 at 11:27
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.2% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 167
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 374
41% 324 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 SE
Zotac(19DA 5001) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.908
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 72.6
Write 55.4
Mixed 25
37% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.29
39% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 58%
EM200AA000 200GB
71GB free
Firmware: ZZUCZZZZ Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14% Very poor
Read 22.4
Write 26.1
Mixed 11.1
15% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.73
4K Mixed 0.24
55% 0.44 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIH55BO Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIH55BO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback