Today's hottest deals

MSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B46
MotherboardMSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46)  (all builds)
Memory32.3 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '19 at 20:30
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 150
2-Core 294
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 929
92% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,169
72% 1,169 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 174
Parallax 170
151% 176 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 158
Splatting 113
122% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-00000 128GB
52GB free
Firmware: BXW7300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 675 639 663 604 672 630 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1686
Write 681
Mixed 771
SusWrite 647
209% 946 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 54.3
207% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 418
376% 596 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 201%
Great: 214%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 428 430 410 394 394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 485
Mixed 445
SusWrite 410
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 57.1
189% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 348
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 321 320 319 319 318 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 487
Mixed 422
SusWrite 327
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60.3
204% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
151GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 329 329 329 328 329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 485
Mixed 421
SusWrite 337
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 61.2
206% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
81GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 266 248 234 227 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 487
Mixed 420
SusWrite 278
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 61.1
205% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 117%
Great: 132%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
298GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 103 101 102 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 134
Write 134
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 98.3
150% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 77%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 103 101 102 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 88.2
Write 79.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 97.9
107% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA HDWE160 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 175 161 174 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 167
Write 152
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 171
188% 141 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
137% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 70%
Great: 77%
ST6000DX 000-1H217Z 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 1.2 0 0.1 0.3 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 164
Write 126
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 0.7
117% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 859B CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDR 859B CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDR 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.1% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 21.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46) Builds (Compare 2,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 SLI PLUS (MS-7B46) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback