Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision WorkStation T5400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T5400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW203
Memory16.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 18:18
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 87.3
43% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 132
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 31.9
29% 31 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 32
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUS153014VLS300 147GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 87 79 88 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 24.9
Write 19.1
Mixed 54
SusWrite 77
33% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T5400 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T5400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback