Acer AN515-41-F6UH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer AN515-41-F6UH  (all builds)
MotherboardBR Freed_BRS
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 16:42
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 123
50% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 205
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Acer(1025 1213) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.89% Terrible
Lighting 9.57
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 14.1
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 10.3
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 122 100 45 114 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 437
Write 318
Mixed 327
SusWrite 103
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 29.8
115% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 182
151% 217 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 91%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
579GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 104 105 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 114
Write 101
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 103
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
176% 2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston 9905664-007.A00G 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback