Toshiba Qosmio G30

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemToshiba Qosmio G30  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '19 at 11:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T2600
uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 35.8
32% 41.8 Pts
4-Core 37.2
8-Core 38.4
5% 37.8 Pts
64-Core 41.5
3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba RAID LD0 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware:
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 18 20 21 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 28
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 19.3
18% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 40%
Toshiba RAID LD1 120GB
27GB free
Firmware:
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 9 7.7 11 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 12.5
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 9.4
10% 14 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.37 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback