Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T2500 407 User benchmarks, average bench 32% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 19.4 2-Core 38.1 31% 41.3 Pts	4-Core 38.1 8-Core 38.4 5% 38.2 Pts	64-Core 37.9 2% 37.9 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7600 397 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 0001) 256MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7967 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.28 1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba RAID LD0 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 16 25 44 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 102 Write 42 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 34 40% 55 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 6.3 1,196% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 40%
Toshiba RAID LD1 160GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 140GB free Firmware: SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 63 64 64 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 63.7 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 62.4 41% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16