Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 93.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 423 57% 424 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Sapphire(174B 2015) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Lighting 29.7 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 34.1 24% 31.9 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 24.5 Splatting 37.2 25% 30 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 14 134 120 41 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 375 Write 344 Mixed 259 SusWrite 113 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 12.1 40% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS512MLK64V6H 0420 8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.9 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 18.1 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	99x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	68x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	47x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	44x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	30x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 58%, 8,730 samples	12x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $589

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16