MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 14:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 294
89% 169 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 988
96% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,945
120% 1,945 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 113
Parallax 95.5
88% 105 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 100
81% 98.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 83 90 76 65 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 261
Write 167
Mixed 142
SusWrite 80.8
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 12.7
42% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 126
98% 132 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
132GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 64 71 74 65 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 27.5
Write 42
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 65.4
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
72GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 87 90 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 47
Write 42.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 87
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston 9905678-043.A00G CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 Kingston 9905678-043.A00G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 21.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback