Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateOct 21 '16 at 01:04
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Memory 1.35
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 65.5
15% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 77.7
8-Core 74.9
10% 76.3 Pts
64-Core 80.3
5% 80.3 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8408) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5354
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 0.53
2% 1.96 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 87.1
Write 85.4
Mixed 31.9
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.17
32% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 114%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB
230GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 36.8
Mixed 20.2
20% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.17
48% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 493
8% 493 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA785GM-US2H Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback