Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100713
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '19 at 03:34
Run Duration	326 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 940 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 50 2-Core 99.5 52% 78.9 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 188 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% HP(103C 3421) 2GB CLim: 1172 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 24.1 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 18.9 20% 19.5 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 15.9 Splatting 20.1 15% 17.5 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teaml5li te3D120G 120GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q072 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 159 111 65 58 55 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.5% Below average	Read 216 Write 198 Mixed 204 SusWrite 109 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 13.4 50% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 86.1 70% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 106%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 94.3 Write 80.2 Mixed 53.9 56% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 5GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 97.3 Write 76 Mixed 51.2 56% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
NSI HD154UI 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1.5TB free, PID 1240 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.9 7 6.9 6.9 6.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	7.02% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 11 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 7 14% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.02% Great: 18%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 17 17 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.54% Terrible	Read 14 Write 13.2 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 17 20% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.54% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 16GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 6.8 6.9 6.8 6.8 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.95% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 16.2 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 6.9 18% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.95% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 10GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.7 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.06% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 15 Mixed 15 SusWrite 6.8 18% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.06% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 6.9 6.8 6.9 6.9 6.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.39% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 17.7 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 6.9 18% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.39% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 14.2 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 7.1 17% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 44%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 15GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 58 55 51 51 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 56.8 Write 55.4 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 55.1 71% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 58%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB 1,261 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 7GB free, PID 6125 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 67 60 59 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 60.5 Write 56.8 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 65 79% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 1,144 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 628GB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 60 60 53 53 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 34.8 Write 56.9 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 57.2 68% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 72%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 0GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 17.8 Write 25.6 Mixed 20.7 29% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 42%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 51.2 Write 51.2 Mixed 32.2 56% 44.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	31% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 12 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 9.3 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA790X-UD3P Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P

CPU
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	2x
Phenom II X3 720AMDBench 48%, 2,612 samples	2x

GPU
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	1x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	1x

SSD
CS1311 120GBPNY $63Bench 75%, 12,393 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	1x
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	7x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 16% - Very poor

Total price: $563

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16