Asus Z9PA-U8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PA-U8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-U8 Series
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 18:54
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2
Socket-R 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 221
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 638
68% 541 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 63.3
56% 69 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 65
Splatting 70.2
57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1174 1040 1000 1014 974 991 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1909
Write 1,392
Mixed 749
SusWrite 1,032
283% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 53.2
193% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 449
380% 567 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 226%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
257GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 435 409 420 423 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 396
Mixed 415
SusWrite 436
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 48.3
167% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 247
217% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 126%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
467GB free
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 86 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 86.2
Write 81.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 87
52% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YH 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 32.9
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-U8 Series Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-U8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $709
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback