Viak8t AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemViak8t AWRDACPI  (all builds)
Motherboard K8T800-8237
Memory0.3 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '19 at 09:21
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3000+-$35
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 86.9
1-Core 26
2-Core 25.6
38% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 24.7
8-Core 15.6
3% 20.2 Pts
64-Core 24.3
2% 24.3 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6800 GT
Asus(1043 81BC) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 0
1% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 15GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.8 1 2 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4
Write 1
SusWrite 1
1% 2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 64%
IC35L120AVV207-0 124GB
63GB free
Firmware: V24OA66A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 34 34 22 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 23
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 28.2
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 30%
Generic Mass-Storage 16GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1.7 3.5 1.9 0.7 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 1.3
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 1.7
3% 2.33 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.73% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 0
3% 1.1 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.73%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback