Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Viak8t AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Viak8t AWRDACPI (all builds)
Motherboard	K8T800-8237
Memory	0.3 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '19 at 09:21
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 3000+-$35 276 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket 940, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 86.9 1-Core 26 2-Core 25.6 38% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 24.7 8-Core 15.6 3% 20.2 Pts	64-Core 24.3 2% 24.3 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6800 GT 3 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 81BC) 128MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 0 1% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 15GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.8 1 2 1.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4 Write 1 SusWrite 1 1% 2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 64%
IC35L120AVV207-0 124GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 63GB free Firmware: V24OA66A SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 34 34 22 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 35.4 Write 23 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 28.2 21% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 30%
Generic Mass-Storage 16GB 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1.7 3.5 1.9 0.7 1.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	2.72% Terrible	Read 4.8 Write 1.3 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 1.7 3% 2.33 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.72% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 4096, 1024 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.73% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.2 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 0 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $298	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback