Asrock H270 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H270 Performance  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '19 at 14:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 240
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 457
59% 446 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 04D3) 2GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 19.7
Parallax 20.7
14% 19.2 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 20.3
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 303 301 300 298 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 438
Mixed 415
SusWrite 304
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 52.3
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 65.2
131% 264 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
281GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 76.7
Write 71.7
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 77.3
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST2000DX001 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: CV13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 179 186 182 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 175
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 183
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
821GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 114 116 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 108
Write 80.3
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 113
74% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
227GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 61.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 62.5
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.4% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 Performance Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock H270 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $609
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback