Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2405S
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 162
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 275
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
MSI(1462 277C) 3GB
CLim: 972 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 52.8
35% 42.2 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 38.7
30% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 242 340 308 341 355 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 343
Write 138
Mixed 144
SusWrite 302
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 26.3
98% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 98.1
DQ Mixed 37.2
37% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 06CE AD3LHS4GE1WB-BKGE 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback