Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 07:48
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 69
2-Core 123
56% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 126
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310
Nvidia(10DE 0733) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 188 174 173 193 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 342
Write 166
Mixed 157
SusWrite 200
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 29
101% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 91.4
DQ Mixed 38.6
37% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
46GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 59 59 58 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 54.6
Write 54.9
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 59.9
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback