Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131011
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '19 at 13:05
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 78.7 1-Core 32.7 2-Core 54.5 40% 55.3 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 273 27% 220 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.2% Above average	Lighting 65 Reflection 67.1 Parallax 53.6 53% 61.9 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 74.2 60% 72.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 71 57 50 49 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 122 Write 101 Mixed 75 SusWrite 62.9 67% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 84%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 298GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 116 120 121 117 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 146 Write 103 Mixed 65 SusWrite 119 140% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28% Poor	MC Read 12 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	37x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	5x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
T25 31TBTeamBench 58%, 15 samples	3x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	4x
99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 29 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $607

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16