Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '19 at 10:20
Run Duration	623 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 102 2-Core 207 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 400 54% 404 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 224 Write 119 Mixed 150 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 25.6 92% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 130 98% 130 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 80%
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 32GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1.8 128 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 431 Write 136 Mixed 177 SusWrite 45.8 43% 197 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 30.8 111% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 141 111% 155 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 80%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 278GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 81 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 90.7 Write 82.3 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 27.4 49% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 69%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB 1,261 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free, PID 6125 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 70 78 76 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 89.8 Write 62.5 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 50.2 82% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 68%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 57GB free, PID 070e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 17.7 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 12 22% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 3.4 238% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 18%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 3.4 148 152 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 144 Write 116 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 50.6 122% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR8GU16H5128-33 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 0510 GR8GU16H5128-33 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15.5 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 14.9 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	188x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16