Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 66.3 2-Core 138 61% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 444 43% 354 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Asus(1043 04C4) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.8% Below average	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 90.8 Parallax 163 0% 84.8 fps	MRender 90.1 Gravity 126 Splatting 130 96% 115 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 94%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 95.8 Write 114 Mixed 27.8 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 147GB free Firmware: CC26 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,679 Write 38 Mixed 65.3 665% 927 MB/s	4K Read 317 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 2.1 13,480% 107 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 11 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples	34x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples	20x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	9x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $265

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16