ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM 49Y6512

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	IBM 49Y6512 (all builds)
Memory	28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100426
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '16 at 02:20
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 66 2-Core 119 50% 83.1 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 477 43% 364 Pts	64-Core 1,028 64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 999GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 199GB free Firmware: 2.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 292 Mixed 356 277% 369 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 2.75 4K Mixed 2.83 1,556% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 217%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 119GB free Firmware: 2.13 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 145 Write 141 Mixed 125 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.51 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 1.03 203% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 110GB free Firmware: 2.13 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 144 Write 139 Mixed 132 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.52 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 1.01 201% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 77GB free Firmware: 2.13 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 135 Write 133 Mixed 127 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.96 194% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 255GB 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	214% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 269 Mixed 338 270% 359 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.38 1,258% 9.56 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	40% Below average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 13.8 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 8 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback