IBM 49Y6512

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardIBM 49Y6512  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100426
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 10 '16 at 02:20
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 66
2-Core 119
50% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 477
43% 364 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 999GB
199GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 292
Mixed 356
277% 369 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 2.75
4K Mixed 2.83
1,556% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 217%
Great: 217%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB
119GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 145
Write 141
Mixed 125
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.51
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 1.03
203% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 82%
Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB
110GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 144
Write 139
Mixed 132
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.52
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 1.01
201% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB
77GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 133
Mixed 127
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.96
194% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 255GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
214% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 269
Mixed 338
270% 359 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.38
1,258% 9.56 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback