IBM Node 1, Processor Card

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows Vista is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (128GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.
MotherboardIBM Node 1, Processor Card  (all builds)
Memory107.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows Vista
BIOS Date20130728
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateJun 23 '14 at 19:08
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X7542
Node 1 Socket 1, 4 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 129
44% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 519
46% 390 Pts
64-Core 1,536
95% 1,536 Pts
Poor: 32% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM 320GB High IOPS MS Class PCIe Adapter 320GB
595GB free
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 778
Write 509
Mixed 588
139% 625 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 34.1
113% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 65.8
77% 131 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 122%
IBM 320GB High IOPS MS Class PCIe Adapter 320GB
595GB free
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 779
Write 506
Mixed 580
138% 622 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 33.5
113% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 65.6
76% 131 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 104%
Great: 122%
IBM 320GB High IOPS MS Class PCIe Adapter 320GB
595GB free
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 782
Write 504
Mixed 571
137% 619 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 34.7
114% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 67.9
76% 128 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 122%
IBM 1726-2xx FAStT Multi-Path Disk Device 2TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0617
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
IBM 1726-2xx FAStT Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0617
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
IBM 1726-2xx FAStT Multi-Path Disk Device 299GB
5TB free
Firmware: 0617
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
IBM ServeRAID M5025 7TB
5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
230% Outstanding
Read 632
Write 165
Mixed 269
265% 355 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 1.13
882% 6.54 MB/s
IBM 1726-2xx FAStT Multi-Path Disk Device 2TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0617
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
IBM 1726-2xx FAStT Multi-Path Disk Device 2TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0617
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
IBM 1726-2xx FAStT Multi-Path Disk Device 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0617
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
IBM 1726-2xx FAStT Multi-Path Disk Device 2TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0617
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 277
Write 137
Mixed 181
149% 198 MB/s
4K Read 1.63
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.57
147% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback