ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	. .
Motherboard	http://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35-E(Intel P35+ICH9R)
Memory	7 GB free of 8 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20080530
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '16 at 21:00
Run Duration	99 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5462 662 User benchmarks, average bench 48% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 86.7 46% 69.8 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 170 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B E810) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	8.98% Terrible	Lighting 11.5 Reflection 9.77 Parallax 8.19 9% 9.83 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 7.73 Splatting 12.9 8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.98% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (64) Unknown 100 100 39504 (65) Unknown 100 100 29008 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 42 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 23 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 692 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 100 150325428251 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 42 (EA) Unknown 100 100 30 (F1) Unknown 100 100 40 (F2) Unknown 100 100 16 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	33.5% Below average	Read 201 Write 106 Mixed 100 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 8.54 62% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 24.8 DQ Write 31.9 DQ Mixed 8.97 12% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	26.9% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.57 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback