HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8137
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 21:46
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 36.2
1-Core 31
2-Core 61.3
26% 42.8 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 118
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
HP(103C 8137) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
1.42% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.75
1% 2.19 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.16 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.42%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 238 293 275 253 269 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41% Average
Read 353
Write 274
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 256
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 8.5
33% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 16.5
14% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC2P1-B1AH Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 4GB
1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback