Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 69.9 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 152 58% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 412 45% 354 Pts	64-Core 1,445 89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 999GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 479GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 359 394 346 412 380 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	81% Excellent	Read 400 Write 348 Mixed 305 SusWrite 366 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 46.9 4K Mixed 31.4 98% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 251 191% 262 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 81%
LSI Logical Volume 2TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 1.5TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 160 165 164 164 165 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 154 Write 162 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 164 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 1.2 259% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G4D1 8x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.3% Excellent	MC Read 37 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 30.1 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 4.7 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	64x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	64x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	40x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	56x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	41x
Quadro K6000Nvidia $4,000Bench 44%, 1,173 samples	24x

RAM
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 8x8GBSamsungBench 94%, 283 samples	34x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 8x8GBHynixBench 94%, 307 samples	21x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GBMicronBench 77%, 512 samples	19x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16