Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Memory 72.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 315 95% 181 Pts	4-Core 647 8-Core 1262 113% 954 Pts	64-Core 1,262 78% 1,262 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37C2) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 121 Parallax 123 105% 124 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 123 Splatting 101 106% 134 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59 8,648 User benchmarks, average bench 193% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,721 Write 1,516 Mixed 1,338 340% 1,525 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 65.5 229% 86.2 MB/s	DQ Read 855 DQ Write 1,345 DQ Mixed 796 688% 998 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4GB free Firmware: DC12 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 277 Write 233 Mixed 275 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 42.6 158% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 141 136% 215 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 46GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 138 164 159 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 129 Write 126 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 145 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 500GB 5,329 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 272GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 136 140 139 139 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 130 Write 144 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 138 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 62%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 47GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 87 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 47.5 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 86.1 71% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 43%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB 12,134 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 14GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 24 26 27 23 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 142 Write 42.7 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 25.6 67% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.3 127% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.8% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 16.9 62% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 20.7 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	883x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	547x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	285x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	204x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	133x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $557

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16