Dell PowerEdge 1950

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell PowerEdge 1950
MotherboardDell PowerEdge 1950  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 06:33
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 83.3
42% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 338
30% 254 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Asus(1043 01F4) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.94 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i 146GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 47 46 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 71
Write 46.6
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 46.2
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.3
225% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 89%
Dell PERC 6/i 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 146
Write 42.2
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 41.6
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 2.2
Write 42.8
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 42.8
17% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 13%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 3
Write 42.9
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 43.3
17% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 4.2
Write 42.3
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 42.7
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 43 44 43 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 3.2
Write 42.4
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 43.4
18% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 5.5
Write 43.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 42.7
17% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
112% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36HTF51272F667E1D4 802C7FB3802C 36HTF51272F667E1D4 0D9B7FB3802C 0D9B7FB3802C 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge 1950 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge 1950

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback