Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 137 58% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 584 50% 429 Pts	64-Core 789 49% 789 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 14.9 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 18.8 12% 16 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 18.1 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ezcool S280 240GB 722 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: EZ2019 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 186 210 213 201 198 MB/s Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.1% Below average	Read 233 Write 224 Mixed 198 SusWrite 201 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 12 52% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 60.3 DQ Write 19.2 DQ Mixed 19.1 20% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 105%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2TB free Firmware: C1D8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 150 149 150 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 148 Write 135 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 148 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 4GB 1,443 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1643 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 1.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 2.7 4% 3.57 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 A8 NA72Z8Y512M8M-E25H ID:80 2C 18JSF25672PDZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 9KSF25672PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672PDZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PDZ1G1D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672PDZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672PDZ1G4G1 JED... 66GB 800, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1066, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 8192, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.9% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 8.7 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16