Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Foxconn G31MX Series (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080929
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '19 at 09:54
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 46.9 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 49.6 28% 42.9 Pts	4-Core 47.9 8-Core 56.1 7% 52 Pts	64-Core 65.1 4% 65.1 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD160JJ 149GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZM100-37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 23 23 24 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.99% Terrible	Read 9.8 Write 10.2 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 21.4 10% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.99% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 3 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	14x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	12x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	9x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	5x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	5x
Radeon HD 3450ATIBench 1%, 4,621 samples	4x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16