Compaq-presario NY540AA-ABA CQ5210F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq-presario NY540AA-ABA CQ5210F  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON NARRA5
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090914
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '19 at 22:27
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 280
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 90.1
38% 63 Pts
4-Core 83.5
8-Core 97.9
12% 90.7 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
XFX(1682 9550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 20.5
13% 22.3 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 33.1
22% 25.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 120GB SSD
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 9.9 40 8 17 9.6 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 182
Write 108
Mixed 110
SusWrite 30.6
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 10.6
49% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 13.5
15% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
76GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 63 68 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 74.8
Write 78.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 66.7
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
197GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 94 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 75.3
Write 45.8
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 93.5
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
219GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.94% Terrible
Read 15
Write 14.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 13.2
19% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.94%
Great: 45%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
2GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 4.8
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.1
9% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NY540AA-ABA CQ5210F Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq-presario NY540AA-ABA CQ5210F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback