Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-215JJ Radeon R2E 51 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Memory 38 1-Core 33.8 2-Core 58.8 27% 43.5 Pts	4-Core 59.1 8-Core 59.3 8% 59.2 Pts	64-Core 60.5 4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2E Graphics 43 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 8267) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.5 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.79% Terrible	Lighting 0 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 2.25 0% 2.13 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PSSBN032GA27MC1 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFH01H0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 46 46 45 46 45 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 427 Write 162 Mixed 209 SusWrite 61.4 47% 215 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 31.6 106% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 74.7 DQ Write 43.3 DQ Mixed 78.5 53% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 212 19% 212 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Embedded G-Series GX-215JJ Radeon R2EAMDBench 29%, 51 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon R2E GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 43 samples	8x

SSD
TS120GMTS420S 120GBTranscendBench 62%, 931 samples	1x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	1x
SSD 120GBIntensoBench 65%, 3,562 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	3x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	2x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16