Today's hottest deals

HP 750-170se

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 750-170se  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160118
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '19 at 01:57
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 693
67% 550 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Device(1B0A 90F3) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 35.3
26% 32.4 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 34.9
25% 29.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 193 214 192 214 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 489
Write 432
Mixed 268
SusWrite 226
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 32.8
95% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 248
211% 310 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 134%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 41
Write 36
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 41.4
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-170se Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-170se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback