Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 46.4 1-Core 33.4 2-Core 61.7 30% 47.2 Pts	4-Core 97.3 8-Core 132 14% 115 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.2% Terrible	Lighting 0.77 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 1.47 1% 1.36 fps	MRender 0.14 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 5.17 2% 2.45 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.2% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt128g TOSHIBA 128GB 5,624 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0105ADLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 39 21 30 30 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 396 Write 124 Mixed 153 SusWrite 36.7 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 23.8 78% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 109 93% 139 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x4GB 3,234 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.4% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16