bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 854 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 16:45
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 195
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 204
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 4.2 4.3 5.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 34
Write 4.5
Mixed 12.6
SusWrite 4.5
10% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
691GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.6 5.4 5.7 5.9 5.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 25.3
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback