Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570T 7,298 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 168 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 248 34% 250 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 0356) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.920.0.0 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	6.42% Terrible	Lighting 7.73 Reflection 8.85 Parallax 6.12 6% 7.57 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 9.7 7% 7.92 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.42% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 734GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 6.8 18 60 95 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 9.5 Write 22.2 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 47.5 17% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.8% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.3 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	328x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	202x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	176x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	54x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	31x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $343