Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 19:10
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 127
59% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 214
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 0401) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 9.19
9% 10.9 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR120GB 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 44 46 36 34 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 428
Write 338
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 84.4
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 11.2
50% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 83.1
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 0.9
13% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 86%
Samsung 830 64GB
27GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 158 159 151 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 402
Write 159
Mixed 187
SusWrite 154
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 18.5
77% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 53.4
DQ Mixed 92.3
79% 120 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 63%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID cb10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 18 18 16 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
8.43% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 13.2
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 16.6
20% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.43%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 998946 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback