Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 19:25
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 287
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 42.1
36% 39.2 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 36.7
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$143
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSTi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 194 199 212 211 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 302
Write 256
Mixed 262
SusWrite 204
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 33.2
124% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 145
140% 223 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 129 126 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
69% Good
Read 118
Write 135
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 121
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69%
Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
1TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 132 136 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 108
Write 114
Mixed 87
SusWrite 136
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 120 112 113 108 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 150
Write 131
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 111
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 67%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
255GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 19 37 37 38 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 17
Write 15.7
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 32.9
28% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
51GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 57.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 58.8
67% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback