PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock X99X Killer (all builds) |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150417 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 08 '18 at 18:26 |
Run Duration | 266 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.9%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
34.7%
Below average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 8.5 44 112 167 176 MB/s
|
41.5%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
90GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 409 398 385 372 365 MB/s
|
114%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
22GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 83 87 81 80 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
12GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 146 137 142 144 MB/s
|
82%
Excellent
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 110 108 102 MB/s
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
6GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.1 0.1 0 0.2 0.1 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
1GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
13GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
360GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 89 87 86 88 MB/s
|
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
7.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 76 71 71 74 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
96.3%
Outstanding
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 148x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 45x |
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 24x |
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 20x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 112% - Outstanding | Total price: $718 |