Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire ES1-523

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-523  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TRICERA_CZL
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '18 at 05:15
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-7010 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Memory 31.1
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 42.6
20% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 44.6
8-Core 44.1
6% 44.3 Pts
64-Core 42.3
3% 42.3 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Acer(1025 108A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.5
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.44
1% 1.69 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 184 205 227 224 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 274
Write 235
Mixed 204
SusWrite 214
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 17
54% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 96.4
72% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 85%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB
1GB free, PID 0303
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.7 4.8 5.3 5.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 5.7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.6
9% 7.25 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-523 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-523

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback