Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C70D-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C70D-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF40 0683
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 16:36
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-7010 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 6
2-Core 29
23% 30 Pts
4-Core 34.9
8-Core 37.7
5% 36.3 Pts
64-Core 33.2
2% 33.2 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Toshiba(1179 F835) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.9
1% 1.9 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.5
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 57 41 46 44 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 63.9
Write 116
Mixed 151
SusWrite 71.5
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 16.7
57% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 79
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 77.8
54% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.4
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 3.6
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C70D-C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C70D-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback